Please note that this draft is already in the RFC Editor's queue, after having gone through WG Last Call, IETF Last Call, and IESG review.
Making changes after it has been approved would likely bring the document back to (at least) the WG for review, which seems like a bad idea. If there are no technical errors, leaving the document as-is will get it published and implemented sooner. Discussion on the list here about what it means is good and useful, possibly for a later revision. Mukund's questions seem reasonable for the community to get a better understanding. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
