"StJohns, Michael" <[email protected]> writes: > Referring only to the question of what was this at last call - -03 was > WG and IESG reviewed. Doing a diff between this -09 and -03 seems to > indicates as much text in the body was changed as was left intact.
The IESG review caused a lot of text changes due to clarifications that the IESG members wanted. Yes, much of the text did indeed change but the authors believed the intent was unchanged at least. But yes it's in the RFC editors queue. We might be able to suggest some late clarifications during AUTH48 if they're reasonably scoped to something that would be acceptable during AUTH48, and I'm sure the ADs can probably sign off on things. -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
