Moin,

On Sun, 2025-07-06 at 14:36 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> 
> “ These complications can be avoided by assuming Classic DNS over TCP
> is the only form of Classic DNS that new protocols need to
> accommodate.”
> 
> This is not how protocols using DNS work. You can’t say “new”
> protocols must use only a specific flavour of DNS transport as
> it’s mostly not up to the new protocol or application how DNS is
> resolved.
> 
> This is at least 10 years too soon.

Hrm, I am somewhat torn on this.


I think what would help getting this discussion further would be some
(recent) examples of things that explicitly accommodated for DNSoUDP
transport.

With best regards,
Tobias

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to