> On 19 May 2025, at 6:51 pm, Bill Woodcock <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Will the “trusted” DNS start refusing the .gl TLD soon because of a mad >>> king ? >> >> If that's the case, I don't see how proposals along this line change the >> outcome. If a government in a given jurisdiction wants to censor, they will >> censor. > > However, having three of the four big recursive resolvers all answerable only > to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California > does represent an astonishing degree of centralization. Indeed, governments > will censor, but we don’t all need to depend upon the same government’s idea > of what should be censored.
They're answerable to any jurisdiction they operate within (for some definition of "operate"), not just N.D. Cal. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
