On 5/5/25 14:49, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
Dear authors and WG,
There have been substantive IETF Last Call comments once extending the
review outside of DNSOP. On my own read of the comments, there are two
critical ones:
* Are full-text explanations better or worse from UX or security point
of view ?
* Should the draft merge/include/... with draft-nottingham-public-
resolver-errors ?
Shameless plug: There is also a technical objection in
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/dsouS0lgD8UK36rWgqBkq8LKSWo/
under "Issue #1".
The current text breaks assumptions about EDE Option usage defined in
RFC 8914 and does not state a good reason for it.
--
Petr Špaček
Internet Systems Consortium
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
