On Mittwoch, 14. Juni 2023 22:53:13 CEST Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Wednesday, 14 June 2023 12:49:22 PDT Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > > As discussed earlier. Better naming in many cases until we can depend on > > C++20 in API. > > There's nothing in C++20 that would allow us to design APIs differently. > > You may be thinking of C++23 "using enum" feature, which is barely supported > anywhere and doesn't help us in any way I can see. It might allow us in the > future to change our existing unscoped enums to scoped, but until then > there's little we ca do. > Correct. I was referring to "using enum", which had been referred to as C++20 by Marc. It could allow "type safe" enums without scope.
But yes, I don't think that is relevant right now, which is why I prefer to keep the cleaner API where scoping doesn't make sense. Best regards Allan -- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
