On Mittwoch, 14. Juni 2023 14:59:40 CEST Marc Mutz via Development wrote: > On 02.05.23 10:58, Volker Hilsheimer via Development wrote: > > During the header review, but also in API discussions leading up to it, we > > had a few cases where it would have helped if we had clearer guidelines > > about when to use scoped enums, and when not. > Was there some consensus here? We're discussing this _again_ in the 6.6 > review... > > Let me propose the following, separate issues, so we have something > concrete to +1 or -1: > > [All capitalized words have the meaning of IETF RFCs] > > A) new enums MUST have an explicit underlying type¹² +1 Sure
> > B) new enums MUST be scoped, also when nested in classes¹² -1 Disagree > > C) scoped enums SHOULD NOT repeat (part of) an enum's type name in the > enumerators² > +1 Agree, and if you find you do repeat the type name in an unscoped enum it probably should be scoped. But isn't this already in our style guide? Best regards Allan -- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
