On Wednesday, 14 June 2023 14:26:52 PDT Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development wrote: > I think this should be a completely different question than the usage of > scoped enums in new code. For instance, I'm all for scoped enums and > against such refactoring.
The refactoring *could* be done now, but it's a massive code update and can't be helped with macros. It would increase the size of most headers and substantially so for qnamespace.h, which might impact compilation time. Therefore, I oppose such a change now. But I do support a statement of intent that in Qt 7 we want to revisit this and change where possible. It might be a macro-enabled backwards compatible API, or maybe we'll be able to use "using enum" by then. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Cloud Software Architect - Intel DCAI Cloud Engineering
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
