On Thursday, 16 March 2023 08:58:35 PDT Ilya Fedin wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 07:55:37 -0700
> 
> Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote:
> > If Q_NOREPLY were [[qt::no_reply]], where would the correct place be?
> 
> Isn't the goal to move it where it was previously? Before [1] it was
> after inline and before void, after [1] it become before inline and now
> [2] moves it after void while it doesn't seem to being there previously?
> 
> [1] https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/458587
> [2] https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/464881

The objective is to put it where it would be if it were a C++11 attribute.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Cloud Software Architect - Intel DCAI Cloud Engineering

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

-- 
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development

Reply via email to