On Thursday, 16 March 2023 08:58:35 PDT Ilya Fedin wrote: > On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 07:55:37 -0700 > > Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote: > > If Q_NOREPLY were [[qt::no_reply]], where would the correct place be? > > Isn't the goal to move it where it was previously? Before [1] it was > after inline and before void, after [1] it become before inline and now > [2] moves it after void while it doesn't seem to being there previously? > > [1] https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/458587 > [2] https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/464881
The objective is to put it where it would be if it were a C++11 attribute. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Cloud Software Architect - Intel DCAI Cloud Engineering
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
