On Thursday, 16 March 2023 06:15:57 PDT Ilya Fedin wrote:
> > But your original change hasn't moved Q_NOREPLY, it added inline to it
> > and QDBusPendingReply
> 
> Ah, the inline was on another line, haven't noticed at first, so
> probably it should be "inline Q_NOREPLY void " rather than
> "inline void Q_NOREPLY "?

If Q_NOREPLY were [[qt::no_reply]], where would the correct place be?

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Cloud Software Architect - Intel DCAI Cloud Engineering

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

-- 
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development

Reply via email to