On Thursday, 16 March 2023 06:15:57 PDT Ilya Fedin wrote: > > But your original change hasn't moved Q_NOREPLY, it added inline to it > > and QDBusPendingReply > > Ah, the inline was on another line, haven't noticed at first, so > probably it should be "inline Q_NOREPLY void " rather than > "inline void Q_NOREPLY "?
If Q_NOREPLY were [[qt::no_reply]], where would the correct place be? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Cloud Software Architect - Intel DCAI Cloud Engineering
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
