On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 07:55:37 -0700 Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote:
> If Q_NOREPLY were [[qt::no_reply]], where would the correct place be? > Isn't the goal to move it where it was previously? Before [1] it was after inline and before void, after [1] it become before inline and now [2] moves it after void while it doesn't seem to being there previously? [1] https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/458587 [2] https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/464881 -- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
