On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 at 20:47, Иван Комиссаров <abba...@gmail.com> wrote: > Иван Комиссаров > > 30 окт. 2018 г., в 4:34, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> > > написал(а): > > Can you name any project of moderate complexity using it? > > > > How about Qt creator? How about commercial projects? > > But what I would like to ask is how about porting Qt Creator to cmake first, > before porting Qt? Of course, this is not as fun as porting Qt but we can > _compare_ all three build tools on that project. It is huge, uses code > generation so it was a good playground for qbs. Why not use it as a > playground for cmake? Then we'all have _numbers_ (speed, project files size > and so on) >
+1, if you cannot port QtCreator to CMake, then you have no chance to port Qt to Cmake. Both QtCreator and Qbs can be built and developed using QtCreator+Qbs. Interesting experience: port Qbs and QtCreator to CMake and let see what sort of experience it is to develop QtCreator and Qbs using QtCreator+CMake. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
