On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Martin Smith <martin.sm...@qt.io> wrote: > > How about a merger of options 3 & 4 for Qt 6.0? A QtSTL that combines the > ease of use of the Qt collections with the efficiency of STL algorithms.
If anything, why would it need to wait for Qt 6? -- Giuseppe D'Angelo _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
