On Thursday 07 July 2016 03:00:08 Thiago Macieira wrote: > In case we're not getting the deserved attention due to Summer vacations, > I'll post again in a month or so to see if there's any change.
We have The Chief on record saying that we should use whatever is most efficient internally (https://codereview.qt-project.org/114327 comment from 2015-06-15), and you agreeing (ibid, 1st @ 2015-06-16). So from my pov, the only question is whether we stay with Option 4 or relax to Option 5, and I'm fine with either. Thanks, Marc -- Marc Mutz <marc.m...@kdab.com> | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company Tel: +49-30-521325470 KDAB - Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
