How about a merger of options 3 & 4 for Qt 6.0? A QtSTL that combines the ease of use of the Qt collections with the efficiency of STL algorithms.
martin ________________________________ From: Development <development-bounces+martin.smith=qt...@qt-project.org> on behalf of André Somers <an...@familiesomers.nl> Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 9:20:10 AM To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Use of Standard Library containers in Qt source code Op 07/07/2016 om 09:10 schreef Marc Mutz: > On Thursday 07 July 2016 03:00:08 Thiago Macieira wrote: >> In case we're not getting the deserved attention due to Summer vacations, >> I'll post again in a month or so to see if there's any change. > We have The Chief on record saying that we should use whatever is most > efficient > internally (https://codereview.qt-project.org/114327 comment from > 2015-06-15), and you agreeing (ibid, 1st @ 2015-06-16). > > So from my pov, the only question is whether we stay with Option 4 or relax to > Option 5, and I'm fine with either. > I don't think that rules out option 3 either, does it? André _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
