> Ramsay Lincoln (Nokia-MP/Brisbane) wrote: > On 02/17/2012 09:58 PM, ext lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: > > On the idea itself I'd like to hear some more opinions. Removing qreal > > would cause some SC breakage, but you would also get a compile error on > > places that could break. Unfortunately the signal to noise ratio would > > most likely be pretty bad. > > I vote for removing it. I think that's better than making it just float > or double.
This needlessly removes existing functionality. We promised to try hard to not do that in the Qt 4-> Qt 5 transition. Removing the typedef is essentially a showstopper for people currently relying on double. Leaving the 'qreal' typedef (to float...) hurts less as it can be fixed by recompilation, and is not does not affect code size and performance compared to a global search&replace. Andre' _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
