> On Apr 13, 2021, at 11:23 , Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: > >> What about "ineligible" as Gedare originally suggested. >> > that would be my preference. It is a cleaner terminology fit. > > From reading the mailings this is in contrast to the "eligible scheduler". So "ineligible" is good. That's based on the mailings and not the code.
Peter ----------------- Peter Dufault HD Associates, Inc. Software and System Engineering This email is delivered through the public internet using protocols subject to interception and tampering.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
