On 13/04/2021 16:23, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 13/04/2021 16:02, Joel Sherrill wrote:
+ foreign scheduler
+ An foreign scheduler of a :term:`task` is a
:term:`scheduler` which is not
+ an :term:`eligible scheduler`.
+
Can we come up with an adjective other than foreign. The scheduler
did not
originate in a different way/place and is not fundamentally
different. The best I
have is "unassociated"
The "unassociated" would be fine for me as well. I would like to have
an adjective which fits and if you grep for it, you find the right
spots without a high false positive rate.
What about "ineligible" as Gedare originally suggested.
--
embedded brains GmbH
Herr Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr. 4
82178 Puchheim
Germany
email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
fax: +49-89-18 94 741 - 08
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
Registernummer: HRB 157899
Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
