On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 9:22 AM Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > On 13/04/2021 16:23, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > > On 13/04/2021 16:02, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > >> + foreign scheduler > >> + An foreign scheduler of a :term:`task` is a > >> :term:`scheduler` which is not > >> + an :term:`eligible scheduler`. > >> + > >> > >> > >> Can we come up with an adjective other than foreign. The scheduler > >> did not > >> originate in a different way/place and is not fundamentally > >> different. The best I > >> have is "unassociated" > > The "unassociated" would be fine for me as well. I would like to have > > an adjective which fits and if you grep for it, you find the right > > spots without a high false positive rate. > What about "ineligible" as Gedare originally suggested. > that would be my preference. It is a cleaner terminology fit.
> -- > embedded brains GmbH > Herr Sebastian HUBER > Dornierstr. 4 > 82178 Puchheim > Germany > email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16 > fax: +49-89-18 94 741 - 08 > > Registergericht: Amtsgericht München > Registernummer: HRB 157899 > Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler > Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier: > https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/ > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
