On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 12:14 AM Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > On 23/02/2021 23:41, Chris Johns wrote: > > > On 24/2/21 9:26 am, dufa...@hda.com wrote: > >> I re-read Joel's mail and I agree, the priority should be left > >> ridiculously low (as it is now) or maybe set in the middle (but why > >> bother?). > >> > >> I was thinking about matching classic RTEMS behavior. I don't think it > >> matters in POSIX. > > The SYSINIT and constructors run on the first created thread before it is > > enteretd so it makes me wonder if we test initialisation with both types of > > init > > task? > The SYSINIT doesn't run in a task context. It runs in whatever context > is set up by the BSP low level initialization. Global construction is > tested for all initialization task variants. > > > > Using the same priority would avoid any complication. > Maybe we should add configuration options for the POSIX initialization > thread. +1
The default should not change without careful consideration and a lot of noise on users mailing list. I can imagine some corner cases where the POSIX_Init default priority may have been implicitly relied upon. > > > > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list > > devel@rtems.org > > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > -- > embedded brains GmbH > Herr Sebastian HUBER > Dornierstr. 4 > 82178 Puchheim > Germany > email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16 > fax: +49-89-18 94 741 - 08 > > Registergericht: Amtsgericht München > Registernummer: HRB 157899 > Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler > Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier: > https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/ > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
