On 23/02/2021 23:41, Chris Johns wrote:
On 24/2/21 9:26 am, dufa...@hda.com wrote:
I re-read Joel's mail and I agree, the priority should be left ridiculously low
(as it is now) or maybe set in the middle (but why bother?).
I was thinking about matching classic RTEMS behavior. I don't think it matters
in POSIX.
The SYSINIT and constructors run on the first created thread before it is
enteretd so it makes me wonder if we test initialisation with both types of init
task?
The SYSINIT doesn't run in a task context. It runs in whatever context
is set up by the BSP low level initialization. Global construction is
tested for all initialization task variants.
Using the same priority would avoid any complication.
Maybe we should add configuration options for the POSIX initialization
thread.
Chris
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
embedded brains GmbH
Herr Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr. 4
82178 Puchheim
Germany
email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
fax: +49-89-18 94 741 - 08
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
Registernummer: HRB 157899
Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
