On 24/2/21 9:26 am, dufa...@hda.com wrote: > I re-read Joel's mail and I agree, the priority should be left ridiculously > low (as it is now) or maybe set in the middle (but why bother?). > > I was thinking about matching classic RTEMS behavior. I don't think it > matters in POSIX.
The SYSINIT and constructors run on the first created thread before it is entered so it makes me wonder if we test initialisation with both types of init task? Using the same priority would avoid any complication. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
