Dot can produce svg dot -Tsvg graph.dot -o file
PlantUML appears to use -tsvg Does that help? On Thu, Oct 8, 2020, 1:39 AM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > On 8/10/20 5:30 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 08/10/2020 08:18, Chris Johns wrote: > >> On 8/10/20 4:31 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >>> On 08/10/2020 03:01, Chris Johns wrote: > >>> > >>>> I see generated .png and .pdf for some images which I am questioning > we need. > >>>> The user document images I have contributed are only .png files so I > am not > >>>> sure > >>>> why a PDF is needed for some. > >>> Images in a vector format is very important for a high quality PDF. > Using PNG > >>> for the PDFs is not really good. > >> Yes is does help but I am not convinced by the "very important" bit. I > looked at > >> the user manual executable pictures in the PDF at 400% on a quality > monitor and > >> they hold up nicely. All you get to see is the anti-aliasing effects > which is > >> understandable. > >> > >> HTML and PDF need to be at the same quality level and I have shown this > can be > >> achieved even with .png files. PDF is not something we should treat as > special. > >> At the moment I cannot read the dot HTML images. > >> > >> The PDF quality depends on the contents of the PDF fragment. It may not > always > >> be vectors so I am not sure we can assume this. I have seen PDF get > abused with > >> horrible results. It looks like .dot is vector which is fine. > >> > >> Manual generation is something I would like to avoid and especially if > more than > >> one output file type is being generated. The poor HTML quality of the > dot > >> generated .png files highlights this. Can they please be improved? > > It would be nice to use a vector format for HTML also. Maybe we should > use SVG > > instead of PNG. > > That would be a nice solution but I have no idea how to do that. It would > have > to work on all browsers on all devices. That is an area where the less I > know > the happier I am. Is simpler better in this case, that is a suitably size > image? > > Chris > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
