Hi, In an update of my rtems-docs.git repo I noticed some new image source formats:
$ find . -name \*.dot ./images/eng/bld-bsp.dot ./images/eng/bld-deps2.dot ./images/eng/bld-bsp2.dot ./images/eng/bld-deps.dot Do we have a policy on what image source types can be used? Any additional image source needs to support FreeBSD and Linux. Images can be difficult to get right so I understand there is a need for flexibility and tolerance but I think we need to consider how we manage the process and quality so we maintained high quality documentation. For example on my desktop I cannot read the HTML `bld-deps.png` and clicking on it loads a small image which is clearer but small. The page is ... https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/eng/build-system.html#build-specification-items The PDF view looks OK. I can see we have as image source the following extensions: .puml .ditaa .svg .dot .odg Some formats are old and imported so we live with those but maybe we need tickets to have them move to something that is simpler to maintain. I see generated .png and .pdf for some images which I am questioning we need. The user document images I have contributed are only .png files so I am not sure why a PDF is needed for some. How are the .dot image sources converted to the required output format(s)? I cannot see any information on what to do, what packages I need to install and the options I need. For the puml and ditaa source I contributed I added waf support, tested on Linux and FreeBSD and update the top level doco. Sorry to be a pain about this but I think it is better we sort this out before we all move on and forget how they are created. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
