On 11/09/2020 07:38, Chris Johns wrote:
On 10/9/20 9:34 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 10/09/2020 12:13, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 09/09/2020 17:28, Gedare Bloom wrote:
I am not sure if the 5 branch in the rtems-libbsd.git repo is right and if it
should be made from the 5-freebsd-12 branch? I feel it is currently confusing
but either way it has issues.
Maybe, we can continue to discuss that outside of this patch set? Renaming
a branch later should be no trouble.
An option could be to rename 5 -> 5-freebsd-master, then the mapping
between rtems and FreeBSD would always be explicit.
Yes this is one Joel mentioned the other day and I missed the context in
relation to these patches. I think moving 5 to 5-freebsd-master makes sense.
What we have is confusing.
+1
Would be good to get Christian or Sebastian to comment/agree :)
Yes, the branch name "5" makes no sense. It should be "5-freebsd-master".
Actually, I think we should delete this branch or is there someone willing to
maintain it?
If that is the case why have 5-freebsd-12? Why not make it 5 and then all the
repos are the same?
Ok, this is also an option. Delete the 5 branch and then rename
5-freebsd-12 to 5.
The libbsd branch recommended for RTEMS 5 is 5-freebsd-12.
Do we maintain FreeBSD related fixes off the freebsd-12 release branch only?
From my point of view yes. This branch was used for the 5.1 release
archive and it should be also used for the 5.2 release archive.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
