On 9/9/20 4:55 pm, jan.som...@dlr.de wrote: > Hi Chris, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> >> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2020 11:43 PM >> To: Sommer, Jan <jan.som...@dlr.de>; devel@rtems.org >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] [libbsd] Fix e1000 driver for i386 in master and >> 5 >> >> On 15/8/20 5:57 am, Jan Sommer wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I finally got around to port the e1000 driver fixes which are already >>> present in the 5-freebsd-12 branch of rtems-libbsd also for the master >>> (and 5) branch. >> >> Thanks. I will push these soon. >> > > As mentioned over at the users list, could you please push these changes?
Yes I will tomorrow if no one else does it. > They should enable compilation for i386 again and we could establish Ethernet > connections with Intel network devices. > The patches should apply to libbsd master and 5 branch, as they are both > based on FreeBSD master. > >> I am not sure if the 5 branch in the rtems-libbsd.git repo is right and if it >> should be made from the 5-freebsd-12 branch? I feel it is currently confusing >> but either way it has issues. >> > > Maybe, we can continue to discuss that outside of this patch set? Renaming a > branch later should be no trouble. > An option could be to rename 5 -> 5-freebsd-master, then the mapping between > rtems and FreeBSD would always be explicit. Yes this is one Joel mentioned the other day and I missed the context in relation to these patches. I think moving 5 to 5-freebsd-master makes sense. What we have is confusing. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
