On 10/09/2020 12:13, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 09/09/2020 17:28, Gedare Bloom wrote:
I am not sure if the 5 branch in the rtems-libbsd.git repo is
right and if it
should be made from the 5-freebsd-12 branch? I feel it is
currently confusing
but either way it has issues.
Maybe, we can continue to discuss that outside of this patch set?
Renaming a branch later should be no trouble.
An option could be to rename 5 -> 5-freebsd-master, then the
mapping between rtems and FreeBSD would always be explicit.
Yes this is one Joel mentioned the other day and I missed the
context in
relation to these patches. I think moving 5 to 5-freebsd-master
makes sense.
What we have is confusing.
+1
Would be good to get Christian or Sebastian to comment/agree :)
Yes, the branch name "5" makes no sense. It should be "5-freebsd-master".
Actually, I think we should delete this branch or is there someone
willing to maintain it? The libbsd branch recommended for RTEMS 5 is
5-freebsd-12.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
