I will create a new thread soon. Thank you Denil. On Wed, 18 Mar, 2020, 11:56 PM Gedare Bloom, <ged...@rtems.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 11:12 AM Denil Verghese <denil...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 18 Mar, 2020, 9:03 PM Gedare Bloom, <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 8:41 AM Denil Verghese <denil...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, 18 Mar, 2020, 7:43 PM Alan Cudmore, <alan.cudm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> This is probably not a comprehensive list, but currently all models > except the Pi 4 are working thanks to Niteesh’s work on the uart for the Pi > 3 and Zero W. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> I believe there is some support for GPIO, and I2C. > >> >> > >> >> I’m not sure about the state of SPI. > >> >> > >> >> There is also support for the graphics console, but I don’t know > that state of that with the various Pi models as well. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Finally, there was an effort to port libbsd to the Pi, but I don’t > think it was completed. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> From what I know the Pi 4 is not supported at all yet. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> So there is still a lot of work to do, maybe too much for a single > GSoC project. > >> >> > >> >> Maybe try to narrow the focus on something like: > >> >> > >> >> Libbsd and SMP support for the Raspberry Pi 3? > >> > > >> > That is a great idea. Thanks for the suggestion. > >> > > >> > Will this will be more useful than my current proposal?( Which is > based on Release note generator and code formatter.). > >> > > >> > >> They are two very different projects. You can continue to flesh out > >> both of them if you like, although we prefer a student to focus on one > >> proposal if you are not certain then it will be fine > > > > > > I can't focus on two proposals at the same time. My intention was to > change my proposal if this makes a great contribution and will be > interesting for mentors. > >> > >> > >> As before, to do the RPi projects you must have and demonstrate that > >> you can run RPi at least with baremetal if not with RTEMS. > >> > >> I don't know if we'll have the bandwidth for multiple projects > >> involving libbsd, while the release note generator/formatter may be > >> somewhat easier to mentor. I haven't heard too much enthusiasm yet, > >> but if you write a strong proposal you may convince a mentor :) > > > > > > If that's the case, I will focus on my current proposal and will make it > strong as I can:). I need some clarification on how can I do formatting > part. Maybe start a new thread?? > > Yes, start a new thread. > > In general, projects that improve "infrastructure" are better than > individual BSPs, but we do value both. We like to have a mix really. > In your case, I think it will be better to focus on your current > trajectory and try to make it the best you can. > > >> > >> > >> >> I have been learning how to use RTEMS and rtems-libbsd on the > beaglebone black lately. Having that capability along with SMP on the Pi 3 > would be great. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Alan > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> From: Joel Sherrill > >> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 11:19 PM > >> >> To: Denil Verghese > >> >> Cc: rtems-de...@rtems.org > >> >> Subject: Re: Improve the Raspberry Pi BSP > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Sun, Mar 15, 2020, 10:20 PM Denil Verghese <denil...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> I would like to know whether the projects shown in this > https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2899 ticket is completed or not. If the > ideas are yet to implement I could work on it. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> I think there is plenty left. I am not authoritative on this though. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> I think getting Pi3/4 support still has work. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> I think USB plus Ethernet. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> I recall the graphics work was done on the Beagle. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> I am not even sure that Pi2 qemu support has been worked through > completely. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> It will more interesting to work those projects rather than my > currently selected project which is Release Note Generator. > >> >> > >> >> Meanwhile I have uploaded my draft proposal which is ongoing self > revision. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Thank you > >> >> > >> >> Denil C Verghese > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> devel mailing list > >> >> devel@rtems.org > >> >> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > devel mailing list > >> > devel@rtems.org > >> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
