On Wed, 18 Mar, 2020, 9:03 PM Gedare Bloom, <ged...@rtems.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 8:41 AM Denil Verghese <denil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 18 Mar, 2020, 7:43 PM Alan Cudmore, <alan.cudm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> This is probably not a comprehensive list, but currently all models > except the Pi 4 are working thanks to Niteesh’s work on the uart for the Pi > 3 and Zero W. > >> > >> > >> > >> I believe there is some support for GPIO, and I2C. > >> > >> I’m not sure about the state of SPI. > >> > >> There is also support for the graphics console, but I don’t know that > state of that with the various Pi models as well. > >> > >> > >> > >> Finally, there was an effort to port libbsd to the Pi, but I don’t > think it was completed. > >> > >> > >> > >> From what I know the Pi 4 is not supported at all yet. > >> > >> > >> > >> So there is still a lot of work to do, maybe too much for a single GSoC > project. > >> > >> Maybe try to narrow the focus on something like: > >> > >> Libbsd and SMP support for the Raspberry Pi 3? > > > > That is a great idea. Thanks for the suggestion. > > > > Will this will be more useful than my current proposal?( Which is based > on Release note generator and code formatter.). > > > > They are two very different projects. You can continue to flesh out > both of them if you like, although we prefer a student to focus on one > proposal if you are not certain then it will be fine I can't focus on two proposals at the same time. My intention was to change my proposal if this makes a great contribution and will be interesting for mentors. > > As before, to do the RPi projects you must have and demonstrate that > you can run RPi at least with baremetal if not with RTEMS. > > I don't know if we'll have the bandwidth for multiple projects > involving libbsd, while the release note generator/formatter may be > somewhat easier to mentor. I haven't heard too much enthusiasm yet, > but if you write a strong proposal you may convince a mentor :) > If that's the case, I will focus on my current proposal and will make it strong as I can:). I need some clarification on how can I do formatting part. Maybe start a new thread?? > > >> I have been learning how to use RTEMS and rtems-libbsd on the > beaglebone black lately. Having that capability along with SMP on the Pi 3 > would be great. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Alan > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Joel Sherrill > >> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 11:19 PM > >> To: Denil Verghese > >> Cc: rtems-de...@rtems.org > >> Subject: Re: Improve the Raspberry Pi BSP > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Sun, Mar 15, 2020, 10:20 PM Denil Verghese <denil...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I would like to know whether the projects shown in this > https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2899 ticket is completed or not. If the > ideas are yet to implement I could work on it. > >> > >> > >> > >> I think there is plenty left. I am not authoritative on this though. > >> > >> > >> > >> I think getting Pi3/4 support still has work. > >> > >> > >> > >> I think USB plus Ethernet. > >> > >> > >> > >> I recall the graphics work was done on the Beagle. > >> > >> > >> > >> I am not even sure that Pi2 qemu support has been worked through > completely. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> It will more interesting to work those projects rather than my > currently selected project which is Release Note Generator. > >> > >> Meanwhile I have uploaded my draft proposal which is ongoing self > revision. > >> > >> > >> > >> Thank you > >> > >> Denil C Verghese > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> devel mailing list > >> devel@rtems.org > >> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > >> > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list > > devel@rtems.org > > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
