Hi, Yes I agree. We should keep the behaviour as close to FreeBSD as possible.
Best, Nils On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 07:48, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 12/08/2019 00:23, Chris Johns wrote: > > On 10/8/19 4:33 am, Christian Mauderer wrote: > >> thanks for the patch. It sounds like we will get a behaviour that is > >> more similar to FreeBSD one with it. > > > > Yes. > > > >> But it has the potential to have a > >> big influence on existing BSPs so it would be good to have some more > >> feedback for it before merging it. > > > > Do you have specific BSPs in mind? If we agree this behaviour is more > like > > FreeBSD would that mean a BSP that breaks needs to be fixed? > > The FreeBSD nexus bus use this: > > freebsd-org/sys/arm/arm/nexus.c:EARLY_DRIVER_MODULE(nexus, root, > nexus_driver, nexus_devclass, 0, 0, > freebsd-org/sys/arm/arm/nexus.c- BUS_PASS_BUS + BUS_PASS_ORDER_EARLY); > freebsd-org/sys/arm/arm/nexus.c- > -- > freebsd-org/sys/i386/acpica/acpi_machdep.c:DRIVER_MODULE(nexus_acpi, > root, nexus_acpi_driver, nexus_devclass, 0, 0); > -- > freebsd-org/sys/powerpc/powerpc/nexus.c:EARLY_DRIVER_MODULE(nexus, root, > nexus_driver, nexus_devclass, 0, 0, > freebsd-org/sys/powerpc/powerpc/nexus.c- BUS_PASS_BUS); > freebsd-org/sys/powerpc/powerpc/nexus.c-MODULE_VERSION(nexus, 1); > -- > freebsd-org/sys/mips/mips/nexus.c:EARLY_DRIVER_MODULE(nexus, root, > nexus_driver, nexus_devclass, 0, 0, > freebsd-org/sys/mips/mips/nexus.c- BUS_PASS_BUS + BUS_PASS_ORDER_EARLY); > -- > freebsd-org/sys/arm64/arm64/nexus.c:EARLY_DRIVER_MODULE(nexus_fdt, root, > nexus_fdt_driver, nexus_fdt_devclass, > freebsd-org/sys/arm64/arm64/nexus.c- 0, 0, BUS_PASS_BUS + > BUS_PASS_ORDER_FIRST); > freebsd-org/sys/arm64/arm64/nexus.c- > -- > freebsd-org/sys/arm64/arm64/nexus.c:EARLY_DRIVER_MODULE(nexus_acpi, > root, nexus_acpi_driver, nexus_acpi_devclass, > freebsd-org/sys/arm64/arm64/nexus.c- 0, 0, BUS_PASS_BUS + > BUS_PASS_ORDER_FIRST); > freebsd-org/sys/arm64/arm64/nexus.c- > -- > freebsd-org/sys/amd64/acpica/acpi_machdep.c:DRIVER_MODULE(nexus_acpi, > root, nexus_acpi_driver, nexus_devclass, 0, 0); > -- > freebsd-org/sys/sparc64/sparc64/nexus.c:EARLY_DRIVER_MODULE(nexus, root, > nexus_driver, nexus_devclass, 0, 0, > freebsd-org/sys/sparc64/sparc64/nexus.c- BUS_PASS_BUS); > freebsd-org/sys/sparc64/sparc64/nexus.c-MODULE_VERSION(nexus, 1); > -- > freebsd-org/sys/riscv/riscv/nexus.c:EARLY_DRIVER_MODULE(nexus_fdt, root, > nexus_fdt_driver, nexus_fdt_devclass, > freebsd-org/sys/riscv/riscv/nexus.c- 0, 0, BUS_PASS_BUS + > BUS_PASS_ORDER_FIRST); > freebsd-org/sys/riscv/riscv/nexus.c- > -- > freebsd-org/sys/x86/xen/xen_nexus.c:DRIVER_MODULE(nexus_xen, root, > nexus_xen_driver, nexus_devclass, 0, 0); > -- > freebsd-org/sys/x86/x86/nexus.c:DRIVER_MODULE(nexus, root, nexus_driver, > nexus_devclass, 0, 0); > freebsd-org/sys/x86/x86/nexus.c- > freebsd-org/sys/x86/x86/nexus.c-static int > > So, I think we should change it to: > > EARLY_DRIVER_MODULE(nexus, root, nexus_driver, nexus_devclass, 0, 0, > BUS_PASS_BUS + BUS_PASS_ORDER_EARLY); > > -- > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH > > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany > Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 > Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 > E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > PGP : Public key available on request. > > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
