Hi, BUS_PASS_BUS + BUS_PASS_ORDER_FIRST equals BUS_PASS_BUS, cause BUS_PASS_ORDER_FIRST is defined 0.
So this is just cosmetical but you are right I should add this. Best, Nils On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 at 20:33, Christian Mauderer <l...@c-mauderer.de> wrote: > Hello Nils, > > thanks for the patch. It sounds like we will get a behaviour that is > more similar to FreeBSD one with it. But it has the potential to have a > big influence on existing BSPs so it would be good to have some more > feedback for it before merging it. > > On 09/08/2019 15:53, Nils Hölscher wrote: > > I observed all Modules loading in the last fdt pass. > > The reason was, nexus bus loading with BUS_PASS_DEFAULT. > > --- > > rtemsbsd/rtems/rtems-kernel-nexus.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/rtemsbsd/rtems/rtems-kernel-nexus.c > b/rtemsbsd/rtems/rtems-kernel-nexus.c > > index 15b0f84d..197f23f6 100644 > > --- a/rtemsbsd/rtems/rtems-kernel-nexus.c > > +++ b/rtemsbsd/rtems/rtems-kernel-nexus.c > > @@ -394,4 +394,4 @@ static driver_t nexus_driver = { > > > > static devclass_t nexus_devclass; > > > > -DRIVER_MODULE(nexus, root, nexus_driver, nexus_devclass, 0, 0); > > +EARLY_DRIVER_MODULE_ORDERED(nexus, root, nexus_driver, nexus_devclass, > 0, 0, SI_ORDER_FIRST, BUS_PASS_BUS); > > > > In freeBSD some of the nexus devices have a "BUS_PASS_BUS + > BUS_PASS_ORDER_xxx". Did you have a reason to not add a BUS_PASS_ORDER? > > For example: > > freebsd-org/sys/riscv/riscv/nexus.c: > EARLY_DRIVER_MODULE(nexus_fdt, root, nexus_fdt_driver, > nexus_fdt_devclass, 0, 0, BUS_PASS_BUS + BUS_PASS_ORDER_FIRST); > > freebsd-org/sys/arm64/arm64/nexus.c: > EARLY_DRIVER_MODULE(nexus_fdt, root, nexus_fdt_driver, > nexus_fdt_devclass, 0, 0, BUS_PASS_BUS + BUS_PASS_ORDER_FIRST); > > freebsd-org/sys/mips/mips/nexus.c: > EARLY_DRIVER_MODULE(nexus, root, nexus_driver, nexus_devclass, 0, 0, > BUS_PASS_BUS + BUS_PASS_ORDER_EARLY); > > Best regards > > Christian >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel