On 12/08/2019 00:23, Chris Johns wrote:
On 10/8/19 4:33 am, Christian Mauderer wrote:
thanks for the patch. It sounds like we will get a behaviour that is
more similar to FreeBSD one with it.
Yes.
But it has the potential to have a
big influence on existing BSPs so it would be good to have some more
feedback for it before merging it.
Do you have specific BSPs in mind? If we agree this behaviour is more like
FreeBSD would that mean a BSP that breaks needs to be fixed?
The FreeBSD nexus bus use this:
freebsd-org/sys/arm/arm/nexus.c:EARLY_DRIVER_MODULE(nexus, root,
nexus_driver, nexus_devclass, 0, 0,
freebsd-org/sys/arm/arm/nexus.c- BUS_PASS_BUS + BUS_PASS_ORDER_EARLY);
freebsd-org/sys/arm/arm/nexus.c-
--
freebsd-org/sys/i386/acpica/acpi_machdep.c:DRIVER_MODULE(nexus_acpi,
root, nexus_acpi_driver, nexus_devclass, 0, 0);
--
freebsd-org/sys/powerpc/powerpc/nexus.c:EARLY_DRIVER_MODULE(nexus, root,
nexus_driver, nexus_devclass, 0, 0,
freebsd-org/sys/powerpc/powerpc/nexus.c- BUS_PASS_BUS);
freebsd-org/sys/powerpc/powerpc/nexus.c-MODULE_VERSION(nexus, 1);
--
freebsd-org/sys/mips/mips/nexus.c:EARLY_DRIVER_MODULE(nexus, root,
nexus_driver, nexus_devclass, 0, 0,
freebsd-org/sys/mips/mips/nexus.c- BUS_PASS_BUS + BUS_PASS_ORDER_EARLY);
--
freebsd-org/sys/arm64/arm64/nexus.c:EARLY_DRIVER_MODULE(nexus_fdt, root,
nexus_fdt_driver, nexus_fdt_devclass,
freebsd-org/sys/arm64/arm64/nexus.c- 0, 0, BUS_PASS_BUS +
BUS_PASS_ORDER_FIRST);
freebsd-org/sys/arm64/arm64/nexus.c-
--
freebsd-org/sys/arm64/arm64/nexus.c:EARLY_DRIVER_MODULE(nexus_acpi,
root, nexus_acpi_driver, nexus_acpi_devclass,
freebsd-org/sys/arm64/arm64/nexus.c- 0, 0, BUS_PASS_BUS +
BUS_PASS_ORDER_FIRST);
freebsd-org/sys/arm64/arm64/nexus.c-
--
freebsd-org/sys/amd64/acpica/acpi_machdep.c:DRIVER_MODULE(nexus_acpi,
root, nexus_acpi_driver, nexus_devclass, 0, 0);
--
freebsd-org/sys/sparc64/sparc64/nexus.c:EARLY_DRIVER_MODULE(nexus, root,
nexus_driver, nexus_devclass, 0, 0,
freebsd-org/sys/sparc64/sparc64/nexus.c- BUS_PASS_BUS);
freebsd-org/sys/sparc64/sparc64/nexus.c-MODULE_VERSION(nexus, 1);
--
freebsd-org/sys/riscv/riscv/nexus.c:EARLY_DRIVER_MODULE(nexus_fdt, root,
nexus_fdt_driver, nexus_fdt_devclass,
freebsd-org/sys/riscv/riscv/nexus.c- 0, 0, BUS_PASS_BUS +
BUS_PASS_ORDER_FIRST);
freebsd-org/sys/riscv/riscv/nexus.c-
--
freebsd-org/sys/x86/xen/xen_nexus.c:DRIVER_MODULE(nexus_xen, root,
nexus_xen_driver, nexus_devclass, 0, 0);
--
freebsd-org/sys/x86/x86/nexus.c:DRIVER_MODULE(nexus, root, nexus_driver,
nexus_devclass, 0, 0);
freebsd-org/sys/x86/x86/nexus.c-
freebsd-org/sys/x86/x86/nexus.c-static int
So, I think we should change it to:
EARLY_DRIVER_MODULE(nexus, root, nexus_driver, nexus_devclass, 0, 0,
BUS_PASS_BUS + BUS_PASS_ORDER_EARLY);
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
