Hi, Following is the result of spsem04 test without the patch:
*** BEGIN OF TEST SPSEM 4 *** init: S0 created init: S1 created init: TA01 created with priority 36 init: TA02 created with priority 34 init: TA03 created with priority 32 TA01: started with priority 36 TA01: priority 36, holding S0 TA02: started with priority 34 TA02: priority 34, holding S1 TA01: priority 34, holding S0 and now creating TA03 TA03: started with priority 32 TA01: priority 34 Releasing s0 (This is priority inheritance problem as TA02 waits on mutex held by TA01 and has higher priority than TA01. TA03 just promotes the priority TA02.) TA02: priority 32, holding S1,S0 TA02: priority 32 before releasing S0 TA02: priority 32 after releasing S0 TA02: priority 32 before releasing S1 TA03: priority 32, holding S1 TA03: priority 32 TA03: suspending TA02: priority 34 after releasing S1 TA02: suspending TA01: priority 36 TA01: exiting *** END OF TEST SPSEM 4 *** You can see the difference in highlighted portions of both outputs. Thanks, Saurabh Gadia On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Saurabh Gadia <ga...@usc.edu> wrote: > Ok. I will mail you back soon. > > > On Thursday, August 13, 2015, Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: > >> Saurabh, >> >> Please pull from rtems.git again, create a new branch from 'master', >> and apply your changes to the branch. It's too hard to review code >> that is not all by itself on a branch. >> >> Gedare >> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 5:28 AM, Saurabh Gadia <ga...@usc.edu> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I have implemented uniprocessor model of nested mutex problem in rtems. >> its >> > still in basic form. I tried to multiplex it with the existing solution >> but >> > was finding hard time. To push ahead, I decided to have separate >> functions >> > for uniprocessor and SMP(kept default behavior) and with your review >> > comments will know what to do. Following is the link for the git repo: >> > https://github.com/saurabhgadia4/rtems/commits/master and its JPF >> branch: >> > >> https://github.com/saurabhgadia4/lock-model/blob/uniproc-new1/rtems/Mutex.java >> > >> > I have also tested spsem01, 02, 03 test cases. Following are the links >> for >> > the test case results which states output before solution and after >> applying >> > the solution. I am still not getting whether my code is passing spsem03 >> test >> > or not. How can I verify that? >> > >> > Test Case Link: >> > >> https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B44HRKVuGCkFfnFDVmxqQzZZUzljNUg4YmVPZmEybEp2Q0NNclpvS2FvemZ4Tm5Xa19nemM&usp=sharing >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Saurabh Gadia >> > > > -- > Thanks, > > Saurabh Gadia > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
