Ok. I will mail you back soon. On Thursday, August 13, 2015, Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote:
> Saurabh, > > Please pull from rtems.git again, create a new branch from 'master', > and apply your changes to the branch. It's too hard to review code > that is not all by itself on a branch. > > Gedare > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 5:28 AM, Saurabh Gadia <ga...@usc.edu > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have implemented uniprocessor model of nested mutex problem in rtems. > its > > still in basic form. I tried to multiplex it with the existing solution > but > > was finding hard time. To push ahead, I decided to have separate > functions > > for uniprocessor and SMP(kept default behavior) and with your review > > comments will know what to do. Following is the link for the git repo: > > https://github.com/saurabhgadia4/rtems/commits/master and its JPF > branch: > > > https://github.com/saurabhgadia4/lock-model/blob/uniproc-new1/rtems/Mutex.java > > > > I have also tested spsem01, 02, 03 test cases. Following are the links > for > > the test case results which states output before solution and after > applying > > the solution. I am still not getting whether my code is passing spsem03 > test > > or not. How can I verify that? > > > > Test Case Link: > > > https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B44HRKVuGCkFfnFDVmxqQzZZUzljNUg4YmVPZmEybEp2Q0NNclpvS2FvemZ4Tm5Xa19nemM&usp=sharing > > > > Thanks, > > > > Saurabh Gadia > -- Thanks, Saurabh Gadia
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
