Saurabh, Please pull from rtems.git again, create a new branch from 'master', and apply your changes to the branch. It's too hard to review code that is not all by itself on a branch.
Gedare On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 5:28 AM, Saurabh Gadia <ga...@usc.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > I have implemented uniprocessor model of nested mutex problem in rtems. its > still in basic form. I tried to multiplex it with the existing solution but > was finding hard time. To push ahead, I decided to have separate functions > for uniprocessor and SMP(kept default behavior) and with your review > comments will know what to do. Following is the link for the git repo: > https://github.com/saurabhgadia4/rtems/commits/master and its JPF branch: > https://github.com/saurabhgadia4/lock-model/blob/uniproc-new1/rtems/Mutex.java > > I have also tested spsem01, 02, 03 test cases. Following are the links for > the test case results which states output before solution and after applying > the solution. I am still not getting whether my code is passing spsem03 test > or not. How can I verify that? > > Test Case Link: > https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B44HRKVuGCkFfnFDVmxqQzZZUzljNUg4YmVPZmEybEp2Q0NNclpvS2FvemZ4Tm5Xa19nemM&usp=sharing > > Thanks, > > Saurabh Gadia _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
