On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:42 AM, Daniel Hellstrom <dan...@gaisler.com> wrote: > On 02/26/2015 05:58 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Daniel Hellstrom <dan...@gaisler.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have rebased and tested briefly the RTEMS code that we have used on >>> LEON2/3/4 >>> on RTEMS-4.10 during the last couple of years. A couple of years ago most >>> stuff >>> that did not depend on the PCI and Driver Manager layers were submitted >>> so most >>> patches are SPARC BSP specific this time. GCC-4.9 compiler warnings fixes >>> are >>> applied at the end. >>> >> Is this all intended for 4.11? We are hopefully close to a release, >> but bug-fixes can be made in dot releases. > > If the community accepts it. >
We are close to branching 4.11, but I think there may be value in merging the patch set for 4.11. Would it be acceptable to all if we made the new PCI lib and drvmgr conditional only for the sparc? Then we can deal with the namespace issues and resolving any other quirks in the next release series. I worry about bringing them in with potential issues in their public interfaces, but if we don't guarantee API compliance for them across releases then it is not an issue. Plus, most users who want these things currently would have problems with backwards-compat if we change some things, since they would have been using the RCC release. Gedare _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
