Hi all, On Mon, 2026-02-16 at 22:33 +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote: > Peter Oliver venit, vidit, dixit 2026-02-16 16:44:13: > > As I understand it, Fedora traditionally packaged and enabled a > > lesspipe.sh written by ourselves, in the less package.
Exactly. And as we are an EL9/EL10 shop, we still use this version. > > In Fedora 43, we switched to using a lesspipe.sh taken from > > lesspipe.org (the exact same one that the package review under > > discussion is for), still in the less package. > > > > Apologies if this is already obvious to everyone in the thread, but > > it confused me for a moment, so I thought it was worth spelling > > out. Yes, this was complete new information for me, thanks for that! > That's a very good point, and you're the first one to answer my question > in that respect. If the new package really uses the same source, then > why do we need it at all? Maybe because not all Fedoras (and RHELs) use > that version of the less package? Yes. From the discussion I learned, it is most likely best to build my proposed lesspipe package for EPEL 8-10 only and also drop the /etc/profile.d/ stuff from the package. Cheers, Andreas -- | Andreas Haupt | E-Mail: [email protected] | DESY, Zeuthen | WWW: http://www.zeuthen.desy.de/~ahaupt | Platanenallee 6 | Phone: +49/33762/7-7359 | D-15738 Zeuthen |
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
