Michael J Gruber wrote: > In particular, if the builtin lesspipe is usable, the less package > should make no opinionated choice packagaing an external lesspipe.sh and > enabling it bt default.
If I understand you correctly, this implies there is a lesspipe.sh built-in to upstream less, but my understanding is there is no such thing (beyond a brief example provided in the less manpage). As I understand it, Fedora traditionally packaged and enabled a lesspipe.sh written by ourselves, in the less package. In Fedora 43, we switched to using a lesspipe.sh taken from lesspipe.org (the exact same one that the package review under discussion is for), still in the less package. Apologies if this is already obvious to everyone in the thread, but it confused me for a moment, so I thought it was worth spelling out. -- Peter Oliver -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
