@Hzfengsy I don't think it's fair or accurate to dismiss legitimate concerns of community contributors as 'subjective'. @areusch has already enumerated in some detail an 'objective' list of impacts that an S0 module can have on the wider project. I think at a minimum we should be addressing those points before implying that objecting to S0 modules is somehow improper (which of course it is not).
What is true is that in a diverse community there are contributors who value things differently. For instance, there may be community members who put a much higher value on moving fast compared to others whose primary interest is predictability and stability. You can construct perfectly objective arguments in favour of either of these philosophies, and having both voices in the community is an enormous benefit to continuing development and success of TVM. Let's keep it that way and make sure everyone feels welcomed, recognising that constructive debate (like that happening on this very RFC) benefits us all. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/95#issuecomment-1288780802 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/95/c1288780...@github.com>
