@yzhliu To clarify, I'm not suggesting we adopt an incubation process for TVM. I'm just explaining that we can't reference MLIR as an example of a community which uses the process described in this RFC, because it in fact uses a completely different process.
> In the S0-module proposal, majority of community supported in-tree dev This process explicitly allows a module to be merged _without_ majority support - only 3 PMC members are required. In principle that means a '3 for / 22 against' vote on the PMC would actually _pass_ in favour of merging a new module which seems highly unusual to me. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/95#issuecomment-1286036983 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/95/c1286036...@github.com>
