Hello,
I have a more general question relating to the decision of using the BYOC infrastructure. [quote="Leo-arm, post:5, topic:6680"] It is more high-level than CPU instructions; it operates on the level of DMA, Conv2d etc [/quote] The Ethos-N coprocessor, to some extent, works similar to VTA since that is also the level of programming the VTA accepts. VTA is integrated into TVM at a lower level than BYOC, namely below the TE/TIR level. I would assume that ARM wants to dock onto TVM's BYOC to leverage some previous in-house development (ARM-NN, CMSIS NN, etc), but I am interested in knowing what were further reasons not to go more VTA-style integration. Especially since AutoTVM is (at least to my current understanding) only works at the TE/TIR level. Thanks --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-ethosn-arm-ethos-n-integration/6680/12) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.ai/email/unsubscribe/ccc971d849bad11682f3f13fcd72b31c882bc1d410882a7b145f4505ea05d0b4).
