@comaniac, I believe when you are saying you are going to re-write the merge-composite with the pattern language that means you are essentially going to replace the pattern tables with patterns from the language (as long as the interface is concerned). Correct ?
I also dont see any problems as long as the patterns could be expressed in the language (which I believe it can -- prolly it might end up needing fewer patterns). Agreed with @matt-arm, the merging of regions is complementary to patterns as it is not a replacement to express larger patterns but more of combining patterns (multi and single ops) respecting data dependencies between them. --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-ethosn-arm-ethos-n-integration/6680/9) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.ai/email/unsubscribe/6b0fcf4935abfee7b9963c82ffccafb852cd1354f7167da457105a921803e452).
