On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 21:44 +1300, Tim Whittington wrote: > I can have a look at this. > Is there a preferred way of making this configurable? > Given the caches are static, it's either going to be system property, > or changing to using an instance cache retained somewhere appropriate > (at the moment the builders appear to be instantiated in a lot of > places). > > Just out of interest, does anyone have any data/experience on the > behaviour of the eden/pull to eden/weak overflow style of caching vs a > conventional LRU cache? (not one I've seen used a lot before).
No idea what cache scheme would have top efficiency. Rémy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
