On 14/10/2010 09:44, Tim Whittington wrote: > I can have a look at this. > Is there a preferred way of making this configurable? > Given the caches are static, it's either going to be system property, > or changing to using an instance cache retained somewhere appropriate > (at the moment the builders appear to be instantiated in a lot of > places).
I'd been thinking system property (maybe two since there are two caches but I wanted to look into that more) > Just out of interest, does anyone have any data/experience on the > behaviour of the eden/pull to eden/weak overflow style of caching vs a > conventional LRU cache? (not one I've seen used a lot before). Not here. The current impl looks reasonable though. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
