I can have a look at this. Is there a preferred way of making this configurable? Given the caches are static, it's either going to be system property, or changing to using an instance cache retained somewhere appropriate (at the moment the builders appear to be instantiated in a lot of places).
Just out of interest, does anyone have any data/experience on the behaviour of the eden/pull to eden/weak overflow style of caching vs a conventional LRU cache? (not one I've seen used a lot before). cheers tim On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:46 AM, <bugzi...@apache.org> wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50078 > > --- Comment #1 from Remy Maucherat <r...@apache.org> 2010-10-12 11:46:18 EDT > --- > Ooops, this needs to be fixed ASAP. > > The map sizes need to be made configurable I think (with the sync, 5000 might > be too low for big setups and would result in a lot of syncs). > > -- > Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are the assignee for the bug. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
