Remy Maucherat schrieb:
> On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 16:23 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> The draft is here:
>> http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=315
>>
>> I though you were on the Servlet EG or am I mistaken?
> 
> I was not aware of that file for whatever reason. I now remember the
> language that was discussed, and I remember being in favor of it. It now
> tolerates proprietary configuration of the cookie name, but does not
> actually mandate or change anything.
> 
>>> I think per context would be a big problem for proxies, so I am against
>>> it. There's no need for a patch to state that, I think.
>> Certainly, if they were looking at the cookie to manage load-balancing or
>> similar then different values per context would make that configuration
>> more complex than it needs to be.
> 
> I am -1 for per context configuration, +1 for global configuration (and
> I know JF has a custom patch to do that, which I think also does the URL
> parameter).

If I read Mladen's latest patch to mod_jk (done yesterday or so)
correctly, the values will already be configurable per mount (we will
have a concept of mount extensions, which does make some configuration
options adjustable per mount, like e.g. reply_timeouts). So the concept
specific part of it would not really be a technical problem for mod_jk
1.2.27+.

For httpd/mod_proxy_balancer you can configure those data via Proxy
blocks, which should also work per mount. A proxy needs to integrate
various types of backends, so at least mod_proxy needs that type of
flexibility since other backends use other types of session identifiers
(e.g. PHP).

Whether it's good practise is surely questionable. E.g. I like logging
the session cookies in the httpd access log, but that's not that easy,
if there are a lot of different cookies in use for that purpose.

So it does make your life more complicated, but at least proxies do not
have a problem with it, or will soon not have a problem with it.

Regards,

Rainer

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to