On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 15:53 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote: > It is in section 7.1.1 of the 3.0 early draft. It only applies to the > cookie name. Making the url parameter configurable would be non-spec > complaint but I don't see a good reason not to allow it if users have a > requirement for it.
For starters, I am not aware of such a draft document :( I think per context would be a big problem for proxies, so I am against it. There's no need for a patch to state that, I think. Rémy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
