On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 16:23 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote: > The draft is here: > http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=315 > > I though you were on the Servlet EG or am I mistaken?
I was not aware of that file for whatever reason. I now remember the language that was discussed, and I remember being in favor of it. It now tolerates proprietary configuration of the cookie name, but does not actually mandate or change anything. > > I think per context would be a big problem for proxies, so I am against > > it. There's no need for a patch to state that, I think. > Certainly, if they were looking at the cookie to manage load-balancing or > similar then different values per context would make that configuration > more complex than it needs to be. I am -1 for per context configuration, +1 for global configuration (and I know JF has a custom patch to do that, which I think also does the URL parameter). Rémy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
