Bill Barker wrote:
I would think that using the stage would be more reliable than hacking the
startTime, but otherwise, I have no strong opinion either way.
yes, that makes sense.
Filip
-----Original Message-----
From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 11:49 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: 6.0.x request processing patch
Currently, the RequestInfo.getRequestProcessingTime is not
taking into
account if the request is active or not, hence returning a larger and
larger value if a new request is not received.
The patch addresses the following
1. getRequestProcessingTime returns 0 if no request is active
2. getLastRequestProcessingTime will return the time for the
last request
Does anyone think the values that are returned should be different?
thoughts?
Filip
This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the
intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and
CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or
distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then delete all copies of
this message and any attachments.
In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent through
the Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive information,
such as social security numbers, account numbers, personal identification
numbers and passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]