On 26/08/2024 14:58, Christopher Schultz wrote:
What good is a cookie with no name?
I'm not sure. I know we had some users that wanted a cookie without a value (I guess it is some sort of boolean flag). That makes more sense to me than a cookie without a name.
Is this one of those "optimizations" where an application has only one cookie and doesn't want to waste all those bytes on a pesky cookie _name_?
I haven't yet found (or thought of) a use case for this behaviour. The place to start researching is probably: https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/159 I haven't read all the links yet. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
